Insolvent Liquidations in the British Virgin Islands

Introduction

Liquidations in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) can be either:

  1. an insolvent liquidation and therefore governed by the Insolvency Act 2003 (as amended) (“Insolvency Act”); or
  2. a solvent liquidation and therefore governed by the BVI Business Companies Act (as amended) (“Companies Act”). The Companies Act was amended by the BVI Business Companies (Amendment) Act 2022 and BVI Business Companies (Amendment) Regulations 2022.

This Briefing Note sets out some of the key points in relation to insolvent liquidations in the BVI. A separate Briefing Note covers the issues relating to voluntary (solvent) liquidations in the BVI.

 

Purpose of Insolvent Liquidation 

Insolvent liquidations in the BVI do not have a rescue function. The purpose of the procedure is to bring the company’s affairs to an orderly end by settling the company’s debts and other affairs as well as taking possession of the company’s assets (if any) and distributing them. The liquidator appointed can also bring claims to set aside certain transactions entered into by the insolvent company before it went into liquidation.

 

Meaning of Insolvent

Under the Insolvency Act, a company will be considered insolvent in the BVI if the:

  1. company fails to comply with the requirements of a statutory demand (which has not been set aside);
  2. company fails to satisfy (either wholly or partly) execution or other process issued on a judgment, decree or order of the BVI court in favour of a creditor;
  3. value of the liabilities of the company exceeds its assets (i.e. balance sheet insolvent); or
  4. company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due. It is sufficient evidence of insolvency if there is an inability to pay a debt that is due and such debt is not disputed (Cornhill Insurance Plc v Improvement Services Limited [1986] 1 WLR 114).

 

Procedure 

In the BVI, the appointment of a liquidator over an insolvent company under the Insolvency Act can be achieved by way of:

  1. qualifying members’ resolution; or
  2. application to the BVI court.

1. Qualifying Members’ Resolution
The members of a company may, by a qualifying resolution, appoint an “eligible insolvency practitioner” as liquidator of the company. The resolution will be a “qualifying resolution” if it is passed at a properly constituted meeting of the company by a majority of 75% (or if a higher majority is required by the memorandum of association or articles of association, by that higher majority) of the votes of those members who are present at the meeting and entitled to vote on the resolution.

The members of a company that is a regulated person may not appoint a liquidator unless at least five (5) business days written notice has been given to the Virgin Islands Deposit Insurance Corporation (“VIDIC”) (in the case of a bank) or the Financial Services Commission (“Commission”) (in the case of any other regulated person). The VIDIC or Commission may agree in writing on a shorter notice period.

Where the members resolve to appoint a liquidator, the company shall (as soon as practicable) give the liquidator notice of his/her appointment.

It should be noted that there are restrictions on the powers of a liquidator who is appointed by the members of the company. During the period before the holding of the first creditors’ meeting, the powers of the liquidator are limited to:

  1. taking into his/her custody and control all the assets to which the company is or appears to be entitled;
  2. disposing of perishable goods and other assets the value of which is likely to diminish if they are not immediately disposed of;
  3. doing all such things as may be necessary to protect the company’s assets; and
  4. exercising such other of the powers conferred on a liquidator as the court may, on the application, sanction.

2. Court Appointment
The court may appoint a liquidator of a company if the company is insolvent. The court may also appoint a liquidator if it is of the opinion that it is just and equitable or in the public interest to do so.

An application can be made by the company, a creditor and the Commission (amongst others). An application for the appointment of a liquidator shall be determined within six (6) months after it is filed (the court can extend this timeframe for a period not exceeding three (3) months if it considers this is justified).

Interim Relief – Provisional Liquidator

If an application for the liquidator’s appointment has been filed but not yet determined by the court (or not withdrawn), the court may, on application by (i) the applicant for the appointment of a liquidator, (ii) the company, (iii) a creditor, (iv) a shareholder, or (v) the Commission (amongst others), appoint the Official Receiver or an eligible insolvency practitioner as provisional liquidator of the company.

Such interim relief can be utilised where, for example, there is an urgent need to preserve the company’s assets. The court may appoint a provisional liquidator if either:

  1. the company, in respect of which the application to appoint a liquidator has been made, consents; or
  2. the court is satisfied that the appointment of a provisional liquidator: (i) is necessary for the purpose of maintaining the value of assets owned or managed by the company, or (ii) is in the public interest.

If a provisional liquidator is appointed, he/she will have the rights and powers of a liquidator to the extent necessary to maintain the value of the assets owned or managed by the company or to carry out the functions for which he/she was appointed. The court may limit the powers of a provisional liquidator in such manner and at such times as it considers fit.

Effect of Liquidation
Some of the effects of the liquidation (from the commencement of the liquidation) are as follows:

  1. the liquidator has custody and control of the company’s assets;
  2. the company’s directors and other officers remain in office, but they cease to have any powers, functions or duties (other than those required or permitted or authorised by the liquidator); and
  3. unless the court otherwise orders, no person may:
    1. commence or proceed with any action or proceeding against the company or in relation to its assets; or
    2. exercise or enforce, or continue to exercise or enforce any right or remedy over or against assets of the company.

Duties of Liquidator
The principal duties of a company’s liquidator are:

  1. to take possession of, protect and realise the company’s assets;
  2. to distribute the assets or the proceeds of realisation of the assets; and
  3. if there are surplus assets remaining, to distribute them, or the proceeds of realisation of the surplus assets.

The liquidators shall use their own discretion in undertaking their duties.

If it appears to the liquidators that the BVI company they were appointed over has carried on unlicensed financial services business, they shall as soon as reasonably practicable report the matter to the Commission. Where the liquidators make such a report to the Commission, they shall:

  1. send to the Commission a copy of every notice or other document that they are required to send to a creditor or the court; and
  2. notify the Commission of any application made to the court in or in connection with the liquidation.

Further, the liquidators also have the other duties imposed by Insolvency Act and the Insolvency Rules and such duties as may be imposed by the court.

Notice of Appointment
The liquidators shall provide notice of their appointment and shall, within 14 days of the date of their appointment:

  1. advertise their appointment;
  2. file notice of their appointment with the Registrar of Corporate Affairs (“Registrar”);
  3. serve notice of their appointment on the company; and
  4. if they have been appointed in respect of a company that is or has been a regulated person, serve notice of their appointment on the Commission.

A liquidator who contravenes these requirements commits an offence.

General Powers of Liquidator
Liquidators of a BVI company have the powers necessary to carry out the functions and duties of a liquidator and the powers conferred on them by the Insolvency Act. The liquidators will have the powers specified in Schedule 2 of the Insolvency Act which include the power to pay any class of creditors in full and the power to commence, continue, discontinue or defend any action or other legal proceedings in the name and on behalf of the company.

The court may provide that certain powers may only be exercised with the approval of the court:

  1. where the liquidators are appointed by the court, on their appointment or subsequently; or
  2. where the liquidators are appointed by the members, at any time.

Termination of Liquidation
The liquidation of a company terminates on the first occurring of:

  1. the making by the court of an order terminating the liquidation, or such later date as may be specified in the court order;
  2. the filing by the liquidators of a certificate of compliance, as required by the Insolvency Act, if appropriate; or
  3. the making by the court of an order exempting the liquidators from filing a certificate of compliance.

An application can be made to the court terminating the liquidation. This may be made by the liquidator, a creditor and a director (amongst others). The court may, at any time after the appointment of the liquidator of a company, make an order terminating the liquidation if it is satisfied that it is just and equitable to do so.

The liquidators will have certain statutory administrative tasks after completing their duties in relation to the liquidation of the company. The liquidators shall, inter alia:

  1. prepare and send to every creditor of the company whose claim has been admitted and to every member of the company their final report and a summary of the grounds upon which a creditor or member may object to the striking of the company from the Register of Companies (“Register”); and
  2. file with the Registrar a copy of the final report and the statement of realisations and distributions sent to the creditors and members of the company.

The liquidators’ final report shall contain a statement that all known assets of the company have been disclaimed, realised or distributed without realization and that all proceeds of realisation have been distributed. The final report shall also state that there is no reason why, in their opinion, the company should not be struck from the Register, and dissolved. It should be noted that once the final report has been filed with the Registrar, the Registrar shall publish notice in the Gazette that the liquidation is completed and of the intention to strike-off the company (within a period of not less than 7 days from the date of publication). The Registrar shall specify the date on which the Registrar intends to remove or strike off the name of the company from the Register. The company is dissolved after the expiry of the date specified by the Registrar in the Gazette.

A person who ceases to be the liquidator (or provisional liquidator as the case may be), of a BVI company may apply to the court for his/her release and the court may grant the release unconditionally or upon such conditions as it considers fit (or it may withhold it). Where the liquidator is released, he/she is discharged from all liability in respect of any act or default in relation to his/her administration of the company. A liquidator who obtains his/her release shall file a notice in the prescribed form with the Registrar.

Conclusion
Insolvent liquidations are complex given that there are various stakeholders involved and liabilities that need to be settled (as well as potential assets that need to be dealt with and distributed). As can be seen from above, there are also certain statutory administrative tasks that need to be completed within certain timeframes. The team at Loeb Smith has a wealth of experience dealing with insolvent liquidations in the BVI. Please contact a member of our team who will be able to discuss further with you.

This publication is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice or a legal opinion. For specific advice on BVI liquidations (insolvent or voluntary), please contact your usual Loeb Smith attorney or any of the following:

E: gary.smith@loebsmith.com

E: robert.farrell@loebsmith.com

E: elizabeth.kenny@loebsmith.com

E: edmond.fung@loebsmith.com

E: vivian.huang@loebsmith.com

E: faye.huang@loebsmith.com

E: yun.sheng@loebsmith.com

In the prevailing economic conditions, shareholders in offshore companies registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) are increasingly being forced to consider their rights against directors who may have been responsible for mismanagement of company affairs. Minority shareholders are keen to understand the availability of remedies that allow them to overcome “wrongdoer control”, i.e., where the composition and direction of the board is controlled by majority shareholders.

 Scope of duties

The BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 (as amended) sets out the law governing the “duties of directors and conflicts”. This includes:

  • The duty to “act honestly and in good faith” and in what the director believes to be in the company’s best interests; and
  • A requirement that directors, after becoming aware they are “interested in a transaction entered into or to be entered into by a company”, shall “disclose the interest” to the company’s board.

What is the standard of care that a director owes? The act provides that a director “when exercising powers or performing duties as a director, shall exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonable director would exercise in the same circumstances, taking into account but without limitation:

  1. The nature of the company;
  2. The nature of the decision; and
  3. The position of the director and the nature of the responsibilities undertaken by him.

This duty is qualified to the extent that the director is entitled to rely on the register of members, books, records, financial statements and other information prepared or supplied, and on professional or expert advice given by, for example:

Requiring the company or any other person to pay compensation to the member; and

Appointing a receiver or liquidator of the company.

The summary set out above was first published in Asia Business Law Journal and you can find it at the following link:
https://law.asia/bvi-shareholder-remedies/

View Full PDF

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Introduction

Megatrends we see developing in the offshore investment funds market.

Large institutions are increasingly making allocations to digital assets and/or investment funds investing in digital assets.

Tokenisation of assets being seen as a pathway to access new investors and enhance liquidity.

Development of digital assets as a legitimate asset class in which to invest. Economies of Scale that benefit investment funds and investors in offshore jurisdictions

BVI developing a reputation as the natural home of start-up managers and some emerging managers to establish their investment funds.

View Full PDF

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Loeb Smith Attorneys is pleased to announce that Gary Smith has been recognized again as one of the top-rated practising offshore lawyers by the prestigious Asia Business Law Journal’s A-List of top offshore lawyers.

The A-List: Top Offshore Lawyers is based on interviews with thousands of in-house counsels in Asia and partners at international and onshore law firms in the region.

Gary Smith is Head of the Firm’s Investment Funds Group and is known for his ability to deliver pragmatic and well-thought-through solutions to complex technical issues. He advises on Cayman Islands & BVI investment funds, private equity investments, M&A, fintech, blockchain & virtual assets transactions, corporate, and corporate finance and is regularly praised by clients in international legal directories for his “strong client-relationships and is highly regarded by sources in North America and Asia” and “his knowledge impresses me and his creativity is very good. He is also very patient and intelligent”.

View Full PDF 

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Overview

Robert is a Partner based in Loeb Smith’s office in the Cayman Islands. Robert relocated to the Cayman Islands from the UK in 2021 where he practiced as a Banking & Finance lawyer for 12 years. Robert now advises on a broad range of matters covering corporate (including M&A) commercial, banking & finance, investment funds, crypto and securities investment business matters.

In addition to his legal qualifications, Robert also has qualifications from the London School of Economics & Political Science in Real Estate Economics and Finance.

Experience

Robert has the following experience and expertise:

  • Corporate – advising on cross-border M&A, statutory mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions, reorganizations, private equity and merger take privates;
  • Commercial – undertaking general commercial advisory work ranging from trade and business licensing, local companies control licensing, strategic advice on economic substance compliance, consignment agreements, services agreements and IP licensing;
  • Banking & Finance – advising lenders and borrowers on international finance transactions, including advising on local security registration requirements and providing legal opinions to international lenders on local law matters;
  • Investment Funds – advising on the formation and launch of investment funds across a broad range of strategies and sectors (including cryptocurrency / digital asset funds), as well as portfolio investments and financing throughout the life of the investment fund; and
  • Crypto / Web3.0 – advising on client’s regulatory status under local ‘VASP’ legislation and applying for registrations and licenses as required.

Unlike many lawyers, Robert can ‘evaluate the numbers’, enabling him to provide advice in a commercially relevant context.

Latest Updates and News

INSIGHTS | 05 April 2026

Cayman Islands: Growth in use of parallel funds structures

The Cayman Islands is a leading offshore jurisdiction for investment funds known for its investor friendly regulations, tax neutrality, robust legal framework, regulatory environment, professional services infrastructure and global reach. It offers significant benefits, including no corporate income tax, capital gains tax or inheritance tax, making it attractive…

INSIGHTS | 30 March 2026

How do creditors take security over limited partnership interests in a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership?

Exempted limited partnerships (“ELPs”) are a form of Cayman Islands partnership which are commonly used in investment fund structures, particularly closed-ended private investment funds. This can be contrasted with open-ended mutual funds which are typically structured using a Cayman Islands exempted company.

INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…

INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…

INSIGHTS | 17 March 2026

Cayman & BVI subscription credit facilities: key guide for PE

Subscription credit facilities – also known as “sub-lines” or “capital call facilities” – have gained prominence in recent years as flexible financing options for private equity sponsors and fund managers operating within the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands (BVI). This article highlights key features, legal considerations and…

Overview

Gary is a Partner in, and leads/coordinates, the firm’s Investment Funds Group. He worked as a Private Equity/M&A attorney in England for many years before moving to the Cayman Islands in 2009 to work as a Corporate/Investment Funds attorney.

Chambers & Partners Global has ranked Gary Smith in the top tiers of Investment Funds lawyers in the Cayman Islands and he is described by sources as: “a bright guy, a team player, and a hard worker” (Chambers 2014) and appreciated for maintaining “strong client-relationships and is highly regarded by sources in North America and Asia” (Chambers 2017). “his knowledge impresses me and his creativity is very good. He is also very patient and intelligent” (Chambers 2018)

Experience

Gary has the following experience and expertise:

  • Gary has given expert evidence in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York relating to Cayman investment funds. He has also authored a wide range of articles and other publications on Cayman Islands and BVI law matters, including: “Fund Management – Cayman Islands” published by Lexology, 2021/2022;  and “Cayman Islands – Cryptoassets and Blockchain” published by Lexology, 2024. In 2022, he was ranked in Asia Business Law Journal’s A-List of the top offshore lawyers. The list is based on extensive research conducted and nominations received from in-house counsel in Asia, and Asia-focused partners from domestic and international law firms. https://law.asia/the-a-list-top-offshore-lawyers-2022/. He is ranked in IFLR1000 as “Highly Regarded” for in the Practice Area of Investment Funds.
  • Gary’s practice focuses principally on (i) Cayman Islands and BVI Investment Funds formation and launch, particularly hedge funds, private credit funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, and funds investing in digital assets, (ii) M&A including Privatisations, (iii) Capital Markets including IPOs, SPACs, De-SPACs, and ongoing advisory, (iv) Corporate including joint ventures,  and PE/VC portfolio investments. He provides Cayman Islands law and BVI law advice to large corporates, companies, investment fund managers, allocators, sponsors, in-house counsel, onshore counsel, high net worth individuals, banks, and insurance companies in Asia (including the Middle East) and the Americas (U.S. Canada, Brazil, Argentina and elsewhere in Latin America) to deal with day-to-day legal issues and complex, strategic matters.

 

Amendments to the BVI Business Companies Act 2004 (the “BCA“) came into force on 1 January 2023 which changed the landscape for striking off, dissolving and subsequently restoring a British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) company to the Register of Companies (“Register”). This Briefing Note recaps the current position and aims to provide some practical insight into the restoration process. References to BCA are references to the BVI Business Companies Act 2004 as amended.

Position of companies struck-off and dissolved before 1 January 2023

The position for companies struck-off and dissolved before 1 January 2023 is set out in our previous article.

To recap briefly, prior to 1 January 2023, a BVI company that was struck-off for an administrative reason, such as for non-payment of government fees, could be restored to the Register. This involved the submission of a form to the Registrar of Corporate Affairs (“Registrar”) and the payment of the outstanding fees and penalties. An application could be made by the company, a creditor, a member or liquidator of the company. Under the previous law, a company which was struck-off for a continuous period of 7 years would be automatically dissolved from the end of the 7-year period. For a dissolved company, a similar (but less straightforward) process was available to restore the company. An application to restore a dissolved company was required to be made within 10 years of the date of dissolution. Such an application could be made by a creditor, former director, former member, former liquidator or any person who was able to establish an interest in the company being restored.

Transitional arrangements

There were transitional arrangements in place for companies which were struck-off or dissolved before 1 January 2023 and our previous article provides insight into these arrangements.

Struck-off company

To recap, a company which, as of 1 January 2023, was struck-off and not dissolved or restored had until 30 June 2023 to apply to the Registrar to be restored to the Register unless:

a) the previously applicable 7-year period ended prior to such date, in which case that earlier date would have been the deadline for applying for restoration; or

b) the previously applicable 7-year period ended after 30 June 2023, in which case 30 June 2023 would have been the deadline.

If a struck-off company was not restored on or by such dates set out above (whichever was applicable), that company would be dissolved the day after. Accordingly, 30 June 2023 was the last day that a struck off company could be restored otherwise it would have been dissolved on 1 July 2023.

Such an application would have had to be made to the Registrar under section 217 of the BCA (see below).

If the struck-off company was restored, the company was deemed never to have been struck-off the Register.

Dissolved company

A company which, as of 1 January 2023, had been struck-off and dissolved, had until 1 January 2028 to apply for restoration unless:

(a) the previously applicable 10-year period ends prior to such date, in which case that earlier date shall be the deadline; or

(b) the previously applicable 10-year period ends after 1 January 2028, in which case 1 January 2028 shall be the deadline.

Such an application would be made to the court under section 218 of the BCA (see below).

If the dissolved company is restored, the company is deemed never to have been dissolved.

Position of companies struck-off and dissolved after 1 January 2023

From 1 January 2023, a company that was struck-off for administrative reasons will only have ninety (90) days to make good on all outstanding fees and penalties and be restored. A failure to do so will mean that the Registrar may publish a notice in the BVI Gazette striking off the company. It can therefore be seen that the process of strike off and dissolution under the new regime happens almost simultaneously.

Restoration by Registrar

Notwithstanding the above, a struck-off and dissolved company can still be restored to the Register by the Registrar under section 217 of the BCA. The BCA simplifies the previous process. An application in the approved form may be made and if the conditions set out in section 217 are met, the company may be restored. The Registrar must be satisfied that the following conditions have been met:

  • the company was carrying on business or in operation as at the date it was struck-off and dissolved;
  • a licensed person is willing to be the company’s registered agent on restoration;
  • the registered agent has updated the company’s records and make the necessary declaration;
  • where any of the company’s assets have, following striking off and dissolution, vested in the Crown bona vacantia, the Financial Secretary has:
    1. expressly signified to the Registrar the Crown’s consent to the restoration of the company; or
    2. has, within 7 days of receiving a request to give the Crown’s consent to the company’s restoration, failed to respond to the request or refused consent;
  • the company has paid the applicable restoration fee and any outstanding penalties; and
  • the Registrar is otherwise satisfied that it would be fair and reasonable for the company to be restored.

The period for restoring a struck-off and dissolved company to the Register via the Registrar is 5 years. The 5 years is from the date on which the notice was published in the BVI Gazette striking the company off the Register. It should be noted from the above that it is possible for dissolved companies to be restored by way of an application to the Registrar, whereas this would have previously required an application to the court. This streamlined process for restoring dissolved companies is a welcome development.

Where a company is restored to the Register under section 217, the company is deemed never to have been struck-off the Register and dissolved.

Restoration by court

An application to the court to restore a dissolved company to the Register is still required under section 218 of the BCA in circumstances where:

  • the company was struck-off and dissolved following the conclusion of its liquidation (whether voluntary or involuntary);
  • on the date of dissolution, the company was not carrying on business or in operation;
  • the purpose of restoration is to:
    1. initiate, continue or discontinue legal proceedings in the name of or against the company; or
    2. make an application for the company’s property that has vested in the Crown bona vacantia to be returned to the company; or
  • in any other case or in which application cannot be made to the Registrar under section 217, the court considers that, having regard to any particular circumstances, it is just and fair to restore the company to the Register.

An application has to be made within 5 years of the date of the company’s dissolution.

The restoration application is made by way of a Fixed Date Claim Form together with an affidavit of the claimant, exhibit and a draft Order. The affidavit should set out, inter alia:

  • the purpose of the restoration; and
  • the claimant’s standing to restore the company. Under section 218(2), the following have standing to make an application to the court to restore a dissolved company to the Register:

(a) the Attorney General or any other competent authority in the Virgin Islands;

(b) a creditor, former director, former member or former liquidator of the company;

(c) a person who but for the company’s dissolution would have been in a contractual relationship with the company;

(d) a person with a potential legal claim against the company;

(e) a manager or trustee of a pension fund established for the benefit of employees of the company; or

(f) any other person who can establish an interest in having the company restored to the Register.

In the event that an application is made because the purpose of the restoration is to make an application for the company’s property that has vested in the Crown bona vacantia to be returned to the company, such application shall not be made unless the application is accompanied by the written:

(a) consent of the Crown signified by the Financial Secretary that the Crown has no objection to the company’s restoration;

(b) response of the Financial Secretary objecting to the company’s restoration; or

(c) a declaration of the applicant that the Financial Secretary has not responded to a request for consent to the company’s restoration within a period of 7 days after receipt of the request.

Notice

Notice of the application under section 218 of the BCA must be given to the Registrar, the Financial Secretary and, where the company was regulated under the Financial Services Act, the Financial Services Commission.

Court’s power to grant restoration upon application under section 218 of the BCA

Upon an application under section 218, the court may make an order to restore the company to the Register under section 218A subject to:

  • the court being satisfied that a licensed person has agreed to act as registered agent of the company;
  • the registered agent making a declaration in the approved form that the company’s records have been updated;
  • the company paying the restoration fee and any outstanding penalties in relation to the company; and
  • such other conditions as the court considers appropriate.

Evidence from the registered agent should be included in the exhibit to the affidavit.

It should be noted that in the event the company was dissolved following the conclusion of its liquidation (whether voluntary or involuntary), the court will not restore the company unless the claimant nominates a liquidator, the proposed liquidator consents to act and satisfactory provisions have been or will be made for the liquidator’s expenses and remuneration (if appointed).

Upon a valid application, the court “may” restore the company. The court can exercise its discretion to restore a company but the legislation is largely silent as to how the court can do this. However, case law has developed which provides some guidance as to how the court can exercise its discretion. From our experience, it is prudent that any application to restore a company addresses the court’s discretion to grant the application to restore the company. In Global Diversity Opportunity II Ltd v Registrar of Corporate Affairs (BVIHC (COM) 2020/0176), the BVI court confirmed that the court always retained discretion to restore a company. The court will exercise its discretion when it has taken all the relevant factors into account. Another BVI court case, Trade Management Ltd v The Registrar of Corporate Affairs (BVIHC (COM) 2021/0219), provided some more guidance as to the restoration of a company and the factors that the court will consider in an application. In Trade Management, it was stated that restorations are a two-step process. The first step is establishing the claimant’s standing. The second step (assuming the claimant has standing) is for the court to exercise its discretion. In Trade Management, having valuable assets in Hong Kong, failing to pay the registration fee because of an oversight and the application being supported by shareholders were factors which favoured the ordering of the company’s restoration by the court.

Order

The restoration of the company will not take effect immediately where the court makes an order restoring the company to the Register. There are several steps that need to be taken before this can happen:

  • a sealed copy of the order shall, within 30 days, be filed with the Registrar. If a sealed copy of the order is not filed with the Registrar within 30 days, it will cease to be valid; and
  • On receiving a filed copy of the sealed order, the Registrar shall restore the company to the Register upon being satisfied that the company has complied with the terms of the order. The effective date of restoration will be the date and time that the copy of the sealed order was filed. A certificate of restoration to the Register will be issued.

To avoid delays in the restoration of a BVI company, it is therefore prudent for the claimant to comply with the terms of the order once it has been made by the court. Where the company is restored to the Register, it is deemed never to have been struck-off the Register and dissolved.

Conclusion

As set out above, restorations of BVI companies are not merely an administrative act – they are applications that require careful planning in order to give the application the best chance of being granted. We have advised on a significant number of BVI company restorations. Please contact a member of our team who will be able to discuss the options available and to guide you through the restoration process.

View Full PDF

This publication is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice or a legal opinion. For specific advice on company restorations in the BVI, please contact your usual Loeb Smith attorney or any of the following:

E: gary.smith@loebsmith.com
E: robert.farrell@loebsmith.com
E: elizabeth.kenny@loebsmith.com
E: edmond.fung@loebsmith.com
E: vivian.huang@loebsmith.com
E: faye.huang@loebsmith.com
E: yun.sheng@loebsmith.com

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Loeb Smith Attorneys is pleased to announce that our Investment Funds team has won the “Best Law Firm – Fund Domicile” category at the Hedgeweek US Emerging Manager Awards 2024 for the second year in a row.

The awards recognise fund performance and service provider excellence within hedge fund emerging managers and were presented at an exclusive ceremony and networking event today, 6 June, at Convene 101 Park Avenue, New York. The pre-selection data for the fund manager shortlist was provided by Bloomberg. Congratulations to all winners: https://www.hedgeweek.com/hedgeweek-announces-winners-of-us-emerging-manager-awards-2024/

With offices in British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands and Hong Kong, Loeb Smith advises on a comprehensive set of investment fund areas including Hedge Funds, Private Equity Funds, Venture Capital, Infrastructure Project Funds, Tokenized Funds, Real Estate Funds, Distressed Funds as well as other asset classes. Contact us to find more about our services.

About Loeb Smith Attorneys

Loeb Smith Attorneys is one of the leading offshore corporate law firms considered one of the most active and knowledgeable firms for advising on offshore investment funds formation and launch of all asset classes including public securities, private equity, venture capital, real estate, and virtual assets. Other areas of strength and growth are advising on M&A, Finance, Corporate Restructurings, Capital Markets, Regulatory Compliance, Investments, Logistics, Shipping and Aviation.

Considered a leading law firm in the Fintech and Blockchain Technology space, Loeb Smith also advises on token issuances, application for VASP licences for Web 3.0 businesses, Metaverse infrastructure and other virtual asset service providers, and utilising Cayman and BVI structures to develop virtual asset platforms for DAOs. Loeb Smith’s clients are investment managers, financial institutions, onshore counsels, and HNWIs who the firm advises on day-to-day legal issues and complex, strategic matters.

Some of our firm’s recent accolades are: winning Leading Firm in Client Satisfaction 2024 award by Legal 500; ranked in Investment Funds category and listed as one of the Firms To Watch for Corporate & Commercial by Legal 500 in 2024; named as Recommended Firm by IFLR 1000 from 2021 to 2024; named in Offshore Client Choice List by Asian Legal Business from 2021 to 2023; ranked amongst Top 30 Asia’s Fastest Growing Law Firms by Asian Legal Business in 2023 and 2024; ranked in The A-List: Top Offshore Lawyers by Asia Business Law Journal in 2022 and 2024; named as one of the ALB Hong Kong Firms to Watch 2024; winning Best Law Firm – Fund Domicile at Hedgeweek US Emerging Manager Awards 2023 and 2024; winning Best Law Firm – Fund Domicile at Private Equity Wire US Emerging Manager Awards 2023 and 2024; winning Best Law Firm – Fund Domicile at Private Equity Wire US Awards 2023; and winning The Best Offshore Law Firm – Client Service at With Intelligence HFM Asia Services Awards 2024.

View Full PDF

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Fireside chat with Edmond Fung

Fireside chat with Edmond Fung, Senior Legal Manager (pending registration as a Senior Associate with the Hong Kong Law Society) in Loeb Smith’s Hong Kong office advising on Litigation, Commercial Disputes and Insolvency in respect of British Virgin Islands law.

Edmond Fung is a Senior Legal Manager (pending registration as a Senior Associate with the Hong Kong Law Society) in the firm’s Hong Kong office advising on Litigation, Commercial Disputes and Insolvency in respect of British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) law. We have invited him to provide some background to himself, his practice, and his insight on recent market developments and trends in the legal market.

Loeb Smith (“LS”): Edmond, could you provide a brief overview of your current practice?

EF: I advise on international commercial litigation, restructuring and insolvency as well as trust matters. I act for clients from all over the world and they range from onshore law firms, financial institutions, multi-national companies, insolvency practitioners and high-net-worth individuals. With offices in the BVI, the Cayman Islands and Hong Kong, we are strategically placed to meet the demands of our clients wherever they are located in the world.

LS: Can you share more about your background?

EF: I was born and raised in the UK. My parents are from Hong Kong. I trained and qualified as a solicitor in England and Wales in 2016 and practiced in London until 2022. I then qualified as a solicitor in the BVI and relocated there in 2022 with another offshore law firm. I then moved to Hong Kong in 2024 with Loeb Smith.

LS: You have lived and practiced in the BVI as a litigator for a number of years before relocating to Hong Kong with Loeb Smith. What is it like practicing litigation in the BVI? What is the civil court system like?

EF: The litigation process in the BVI is efficient and modern. The BVI is a British Overseas Territory which has a legal system based on the English common law and it therefore offers certainty to litigating parties. The BVI is a member state of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (“ECSC”). Civil procedure is governed by the ECSC Civil Procedure Rules 2023 together with practice directions issued from time to time. The amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules last year modernised and streamlined the litigation process in the BVI. The ECSC E-Litigation Portal also provides a user friendly and efficient system for active management of case files throughout the litigation process.

In terms of court system, there is a dedicated Commercial Division of the High Court (commonly known as the Commercial Court) in the BVI which manages high-value and complex commercial disputes in an expeditious and proportional manner. The Civil Division of the High Court deals with civil litigation that is outside the remit of the Commercial Court. The ECSC Court of Appeal hears appeals from the High Court and Commercial Court. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the UK hears appeals from the ECSC Court of Appeal and acts as the final court of appeal for the BVI.

LS: What do you like about working at Loeb Smith?

Loeb Smith’s culture makes it a wonderful place to work. The work environment is collaborative, entrepreneurial and friendly. I joined the Hong Kong office earlier this year and everyone has been very welcoming, and I have settled into my role very quickly. We are a close-knit firm with three offices around the world. Even though I am now based in Hong Kong practising BVI law, my colleagues in our other offices are only ever one phone call away and we have already worked successfully together on some matters.

LS: Now you are based in our Hong Kong office, what are your impressions of living in Hong Kong so far?

EF: Hong Kong is a great city. It was very easy finding my feet in Hong Kong – it is well connected, convenient and efficient. These attributes make it easy to see why Hong Kong is one of the world’s premier financial centres and attracts individuals and businesses from all over the world. Whilst Hong Kong is often associated with urbanisation and skyscrapers, the countryside and hiking trails are never too far away or too inconvenient to get to – Hong Kong does have the best of both worlds.

LS: From those which you can disclose, what do you think are the most challenging client matters that you have worked on?

EF: The most challenging client matters are those which are time sensitive, involve multiple jurisdictions and/or languages and where the client is located in a time zone that is 12 hours ahead of yours. The matters I have dealt with often contain some, if not all, of these elements. The key to overcoming these challenges is responsiveness and communication with the client and colleagues, as well as having a clear strategy in terms of what needs to be achieved.

LS: You have been successful to date in your ability to earn the confidence of high-profile clients. What do you attribute that to?

EF: Aside from technical ability, it is understanding at the outset what the client’s objectives are and having a clear strategy to achieve the objectives. Regular communication with the client and being responsive to questions as and when they arise throughout the matter will manage the client’s expectations and will provide them with the client care they would expect from the legal team.

LS: What types of BVI related commercial disputes and insolvency matters have you recently been asked to advise on?

EF: I have recently been asked to advise on a fairly broad range of BVI related commercial disputes. These range from seeking injunctive relief to setting aside default judgment as well as reviewing loan agreements on behalf of lender clients in relation to enforcement action against defaulting parties. In terms of insolvency matters, I have recently been asked to advise on applying for recognition of BVI proceedings in a foreign jurisdiction.

What is interesting is that these matters often involve more than one jurisdiction – there is, more often than not, a non-BVI element to the matter and can involve jurisdictions including the Cayman Islands, England and Wales, Hong Kong or mainland China. The work is truly global and it is interesting to work with colleagues and clients in other jurisdictions on these matters.

LS: Lastly, are there any other developments and/or trends in the legal market that you see over the next 6 to 12 months?

EF: The BVI remains one of the world’s leading offshore financial centres and I expect that the amount of commercial litigation in the BVI to remain steady in the next 6 to 12 months. The rising popularity of digital assets has meant that the legal market has seen an increase in digital asset disputes (such as ownership disputes) and it is likely this trend will continue.

The BVI remains a popular jurisdiction for incorporating entities including investment funds and when market conditions tighten there are often disputes between investment funds and some of their investors. These disputes relate to, among other things, illiquidity and suspension of investors’ ability to redeem from the funds. The BVI could see more of these disputes in the near future.

In terms of insolvency, the BVI has in recent years dealt with a number of high-profile liquidations of insolvent companies and this trend may continue in the next 6 to 12 months.

In terms of restructuring, the BVI saw an increase in court-supervised restructurings last year. With the slowdown of the global economy and the financial difficulties facing the global real estate market, the BVI could see a further increase in the number of international restructurings originating from the real estate market.

LS: Thanks for your time, Edmond.

View Full PDF

This publication is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice or a legal opinion. For specific advice on BVI related commercial disputes/litigation matters please contact your usual Loeb Smith attorney or:

Edmond Fung
E: edmond.fung@loebsmith.com
T: + 852 3580 8487

About Loeb Smith Attorneys

Loeb Smith is an offshore corporate law firm, with offices in the British Virgin Islands, the  Cayman Islands, and Hong Kong, whose Attorneys have an outstanding record of advising  on the Cayman Islands’ law aspects and BVI law aspects of international corporateinvestment, and finance transactions. Our team delivers high quality Partner-led professional  legal services at competitive rates and has an excellent track record of advising investment  fund managers, in-house counsels, financial institutions, onshore counsels, banks,  companies, and private clients to find successful outcomes and solutions to their day-to-day  issues and complex, strategic matters.

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Economic Substance in the British Virgin Islands

circle shape

Share

circle shape

Related Contents

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Follow us on WeChat and receive latest news

wechat-logo WeChat QR