Introduction

Megatrends we see developing in the offshore investment funds market.

Large institutions are increasingly making allocations to digital assets and/or investment funds investing in digital assets.

Tokenisation of assets being seen as a pathway to access new investors and enhance liquidity.

Development of digital assets as a legitimate asset class in which to invest. Economies of Scale that benefit investment funds and investors in offshore jurisdictions

BVI developing a reputation as the natural home of start-up managers and some emerging managers to establish their investment funds.

View Full PDF

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Loeb Smith Attorneys is pleased to announce that Gary Smith has been recognized again as one of the top-rated practising offshore lawyers by the prestigious Asia Business Law Journal’s A-List of top offshore lawyers.

The A-List: Top Offshore Lawyers is based on interviews with thousands of in-house counsels in Asia and partners at international and onshore law firms in the region.

Gary Smith is Head of the Firm’s Investment Funds Group and is known for his ability to deliver pragmatic and well-thought-through solutions to complex technical issues. He advises on Cayman Islands & BVI investment funds, private equity investments, M&A, fintech, blockchain & virtual assets transactions, corporate, and corporate finance and is regularly praised by clients in international legal directories for his “strong client-relationships and is highly regarded by sources in North America and Asia” and “his knowledge impresses me and his creativity is very good. He is also very patient and intelligent”.

View Full PDF 

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Overview

Robert is a Partner based in Loeb Smith’s office in the Cayman Islands. Robert relocated to the Cayman Islands from the UK in 2021 where he practiced as a Banking & Finance lawyer for 12 years. Robert now advises on a broad range of matters covering corporate (including M&A) commercial, banking & finance, investment funds, crypto and securities investment business matters.

In addition to his legal qualifications, Robert also has qualifications from the London School of Economics & Political Science in Real Estate Economics and Finance.

Experience

Robert has the following experience and expertise:

  • Corporate – advising on cross-border M&A, statutory mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions, reorganizations, private equity and merger take privates;
  • Commercial – undertaking general commercial advisory work ranging from trade and business licensing, local companies control licensing, strategic advice on economic substance compliance, consignment agreements, services agreements and IP licensing;
  • Banking & Finance – advising lenders and borrowers on international finance transactions, including advising on local security registration requirements and providing legal opinions to international lenders on local law matters;
  • Investment Funds – advising on the formation and launch of investment funds across a broad range of strategies and sectors (including cryptocurrency / digital asset funds), as well as portfolio investments and financing throughout the life of the investment fund; and
  • Crypto / Web3.0 – advising on client’s regulatory status under local ‘VASP’ legislation and applying for registrations and licenses as required.

Unlike many lawyers, Robert can ‘evaluate the numbers’, enabling him to provide advice in a commercially relevant context.

Latest Updates and News

INSIGHTS | 30 March 2026

How do creditors take security over limited partnership interests in a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership?

Exempted limited partnerships (“ELPs”) are a form of Cayman Islands partnership which are commonly used in investment fund structures, particularly closed-ended private investment funds. This can be contrasted with open-ended mutual funds which are typically structured using a Cayman Islands exempted company.
INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…
INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…
INSIGHTS | 17 March 2026

Cayman & BVI subscription credit facilities: key guide for PE

Subscription credit facilities – also known as “sub-lines” or “capital call facilities” – have gained prominence in recent years as flexible financing options for private equity sponsors and fund managers operating within the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands (BVI). This article highlights key features, legal considerations and…
INSIGHTS | 11 March 2026

BVI Company Restoration: Court process and requirements

We look briefly at how an application can be made to the court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) to restore a BVI company to the Register of Companies (Register), and aims to provide some practical insight into the restoration process.

The Foundation Companies Act 2017 introduced a new corporate vehicle to the Cayman Islands – the “foundation company”. This company structure has several applications and is growing in popularity.

Foundation companies are governed primarily by the above-mentioned act together with certain provisions of the Companies Act (as revised) of the Cayman Islands, which apply to all types of company.

A foundation company is a legal person that is entirely distinct from that of its directors, members (where relevant), beneficiaries and founders. This means that a foundation company can own assets, and can sue and be sued.

The constitution

A foundation company is incorporated with a memorandum of association and articles of association (the “constitutional documents”), which set out the rights and responsibilities of the various parties who manage and who benefit from the foundation company.

A foundation company may also adopt bylaws that expand on the matters dealt with in the constitutional documents, and can even be used to confer specific rights on individuals or groups of beneficiaries. These bylaws may be kept private as they are not required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies.

Foundation companies therefore provide the functionality and flexibility of a trust but without any of the complexities associated with trust administration.

The following classes of person will be involved in the management of a foundation company:

  • Directors. A foundation company will typically be managed by its board of directors, who owe fiduciary duties to the company.
  • Secretary. A foundation company must have a secretary who is licensed or permitted to provide company management services in the Cayman Islands. The foundation company’s registered office must be at the secretary’s business address.
  • Supervisor. If a foundation company either chooses not to have any members, or at any time ceases to have any members, it is required to appoint a supervisor, who oversees its management but crucially has no ownership rights or financial entitlement. In the absence of any members, this provides necessary checks and balances on the board of directors to ensure that the foundation company is being properly managed, and is conducting its business in accordance with its constitutional documents, the requirements of any bylaws, and applicable law.
  • Founder. The founder is similar to a settlor in the context of a trust. Founders have no specific rights or powers in respect of the foundation company unless such rights and powers are specified in the constitutional documents and/or in the bylaws. It is common for the constitutional documents to grant the founder the power to appoint or remove directors and beneficiaries.

In addition, the following classes of person can be associated with foundation companies:

  • Members. Members are not automatically entitled to participate financially in the success of the foundation company unless the constitutional documents or bylaws provide otherwise.
  • Beneficiaries. Beneficiaries are, subject to the constitutional documents and bylaws, able to participate financially in the foundation company.

Characteristics, common uses

The foundation company structure is flexible. The roles and entitlements of members and beneficiaries are neither prescribed nor proscribed. It is therefore entirely within the discretion of the founders of the foundation. The two most common applications for foundation companies are as family offices/family trusts, or in the establishment of decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs).

Family offices. The benefits of using a foundation company to operate a family office/family trust include the flexibility available to founders to determine the extent of any entitlement of beneficiaries, and the extent of their direct involvement/rights to information in the underlying business. The foundation company has a separate legal personality and overcomes issues of recognition and taxation in jurisdictions that don’t otherwise recognise common law trusts. For family offices with interests and assets across the globe, this is a significant advantage in terms of convenience and the potential for time and cost savings in what would otherwise be “difficult” jurisdictions.

DAOs. DAOs often do not have legal personality, and it is necessary for projects that involve DAOs to incorporate an entity that will act as the counterparty to any contractual relationships outside of the DAO (e.g. service providers). The ability for foundation companies to not have members is particularly attractive as this is consistent with the decentralised and “ownerless” nature of a DAO. Also, the ability to provide for bespoke arrangements and rights within the bylaws adds to the attractiveness of foundation companies.

View Full PDF

E: robert.farrell@loebsmith.com
E: elizabeth.kenny@loebsmith.com

 

This article was first published in the Asia Business Law Journal.
https://law.asia/cayman-islands-foundation-companies/

 

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Exempted limited partnerships are popular offshore investment vehicles in the Cayman Islands, especially with private equity investors and venture capitalists who have, or may be looking to, set up their investment vehicle by way of the established GP-LP structure.

As provided in the Exempted Limited Partnership Act of the Cayman Islands (as amended) (“ELP Act”), a limited partner shall not take part in the conduct of the business of an exempted limited partnership in its capacity as a limited partner1. All letters, contracts, deeds, instruments or documents whatsoever shall be entered into by or on behalf of the general partner (or any agent or delegate of the general partner) on behalf of the exempted limited partnership2. Notwithstanding these arrangements and the lack of legal personality, limited partners are nonetheless guaranteed by statute a right to information on the state and financial performance of the partnership.

Section 22 of the ELP Act indeed provides that “subject to any express or implied term of the partnership agreement, each limited partner may demand and shall receive from a general partner true and full information regarding the state of the business and financial condition of the exempted limited partnership”.

It follows that the limited partners’ statutory right to information may be limited by the terms of the limited partnership agreement. In this Legal Insight, we examine three cases heard in the Cayman Islands courts which provide some helpful clarification on limited partners’ overriding right to information.

Case 1: Dorsey Ventures Limited v XIO GP Limited3

In this case, the general partner (XIO GP Limited) refused the limited partner’s (Dorsey Ventures Limited) request for information and documents regarding the financial condition of the fund (i.e. the limited partnership) on the basis that the limited partnership agreement contained an express provision which entitled the limited partners to receive the fund’s annual audited accounts and unaudited quarterly accounts by certain dates or in any event as soon as practicable. The general partner argued that, as a matter of construction, this contractual provision meant that the general right to information under section 22 of the ELP Act which would have entitled the limited partners to more information than that expressly provided in the limited partnership agreement was excluded. In its argument in the case, the general partner also tried to rely on the principle set in the case of Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd4 where a term would be implied in a commercial contract where ‘it satisfies the test of business necessity’5 or ‘it is so obvious that it goes without saying’.6

The Court rebutted the general partner’s arguments in the Dorsey Ventures case and ultimately allowed the limited partner’s request for more information than that stated in the limited partnership agreement. In her decision, the Judge held that the right to receive true and full information regarding the state of the business and financial condition of the exempted limited partnership under section 22 of the ELP Act when read in conjunction with section 21 of the ELP Act, contemplates a broader class of information than merely audited and unaudited accounts as provided in the limited partnership agreement.

Section 21 of the ELP Act provides that:

“a general partner shall keep or cause to be kept proper books of account including, where applicable, material underlying documentation including contracts and invoices, with respect to –

(a) all sums of money received and expended by the exempted limited partnership and matters in respect of which the receipt of expenditure takes place;
(b) all sales and purchases of goods by the exempted limited partnership; and
(c) the assets and liabilities of the exempted limited partnership”.

The Judge also held that a reasonable man with background knowledge of the parties could not have understood the parties to have intended to exclude the statutory right to information under section 22 of the ELP Act in the absence of express wording in the limited partnership agreement to that effect.

This judgment clarifies the extent of the statutory right to information under section 22 of the ELP Act; any party wanting to restrict or exclude such statutory right will have to expressly do so in the limited partnership agreement.

Case 2: In the matter of Gulf Investment Corporation et al .v. The Port Fund LP et al7

In this case, the limited partners made a request for disclosure of information relating to the limited partnership’s business by the general partner under section 22 of the ELP Act. The general partner raised concerns that without appropriate safeguards the information that was requested may have been misused for other purposes by the limited partners and particulars were provided to the Court. The general partner also objected to the production of proprietary working papers in response to the request and the provision of any papers which would contain privileged material.

The Court found that the motives and bona fides of the limited partners’ request is irrelevant to their right to demand true and full information as such right is expressed in unqualified terms in section 22 of the ELP Act. The Court also dismissed the assertion of privilege and the proprietary nature of the working papers on the basis that there is no condition in the ELP Act or the limited partnership agreement relating to working papers or material that is covered by legal privilege. The Judge in the case noted that as a matter of Cayman Islands law, a general partner cannot assert privilege against a limited partner unless the legal advice itself concerns a dispute with a limited partner8. Where a general partner seeks legal advice for the benefit of the partnership (as opposed to for its own benefit) in litigation against the other partners, the general partner will not be entitled to assert privilege against the limited partner. As to the working papers, the Judge in the case noted that there was nothing in section 22 of the ELP Act (or the limited partnership agreement) that suggests that there is any limitation to be placed on the information that was required to be provided to satisfy the ‘true and full’ requirement.

This judgment highlights once again the overarching and unqualified nature of the limited partners’ statutory right to information under section 22 of the ELP Act.

Case 3: In the matter of Neoma Manager (Mauritius) Limited et al9

In this case, there was a dispute on the accuracy of the calculations of the limited partners’ capital account balances in the fund/limited partnership and the limited partners made an application seeking true and full information regarding the state of the business and financial condition of the limited partnership, including, among other things, various categories of information and documents which underpinned the investment manager’s calculations. The general partner and investment manager refused to provide the information and documents requested, asserting, among things, that the requests were disproportionate, that the information is not readily available and that the information already provided was sufficient to satisfy the requirement under section 22 of the ELP Act.

The Court decided in favour of the limited partners and the Judge’s decision was a welcome reminder of how “true and full” information about a partnership’s business state and financial condition is a “very wide target to aim at” and cannot be easily resisted.

In his judgment, Justice Parker made the following observations which provide some helpful guidance on the interpretation of section 22 of the ELP Act by the Cayman Islands courts:

  • A limited partner may make a relevant “demand” of a general partner for material under section 22 of the ELP Act. Once that demand is made, the general partner is then under an obligation to provide the requested material provided it falls within the wide ambit of the section.
  • The entitlement to “true and full information” regarding “the state of the business and financial condition of the exempted limited partnership” arises from the general partner’s position as agent and fiduciary of the partnership and, since the exempted limited partnership has no separate legal personality, as agent of each of the limited partners.
  • The limited partners, as the economic owners of the partnership, are entitled to the same information that is available to the general partner concerning the business and financial affairs of the partnership in this regard so that they may be properly informed as to what has been done on their behalf.
  • Where the general partner does not have the information requested under section 22 of the ELP Act, it should make all reasonable efforts to obtain it from third parties in order to fulfill its obligation under section 22 of the ELP Act and if such information does not exist, it should explain what searches have been conducted and why it is not possible to retrieve the requested information.

Conclusion

The three judgments reported above all have a common theme which is that limited partners have an overriding general right to information under section 22 of the ELP Act and the only way to limit such right is to modify it by making express reference to it in the limited partnership agreement. Any other attempt to rebut the application of such right is likely to be dismissed by the Cayman Islands courts.

View Full PDF

1 Section 14(1) ELP Act
2 Section 14(2) ELP Act
3 FSD 38 of 2018, unreported 22 October 2018
4 [2016] AC 742
5 Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd AC 742 [17]
6 Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd AC 742 [18]
7 FSD 235 of 2019 and FSD 13 of 2020, unreported 16 June 2020
8 Re Torchlight, unreported McMillan J 26 February 2016
9 FSD 322 of 2020; FSD 141 of 2021; FSD 52 of 2022 (RPJ)

This publication is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice or a legal opinion. For specific advice on the matters covered in this Legal Insight, please contact your usual Loeb Smith attorney.

Share to WeChat

“Scan QR Code” in WeChat and tap ··· to share.

QR Code

Overview

Rotsen is based in Loeb Smith’s Cayman Islands office where he focuses on client relationships and ensuring adherence to compliance and regulatory requirements.

Latest Updates and News

INSIGHTS | 30 March 2026

How do creditors take security over limited partnership interests in a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership?

Exempted limited partnerships (“ELPs”) are a form of Cayman Islands partnership which are commonly used in investment fund structures, particularly closed-ended private investment funds. This can be contrasted with open-ended mutual funds which are typically structured using a Cayman Islands exempted company.
INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…
INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…
INSIGHTS | 17 March 2026

Cayman & BVI subscription credit facilities: key guide for PE

Subscription credit facilities – also known as “sub-lines” or “capital call facilities” – have gained prominence in recent years as flexible financing options for private equity sponsors and fund managers operating within the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands (BVI). This article highlights key features, legal considerations and…
INSIGHTS | 11 March 2026

BVI Company Restoration: Court process and requirements

We look briefly at how an application can be made to the court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) to restore a BVI company to the Register of Companies (Register), and aims to provide some practical insight into the restoration process.

Overview

Cindy is based in Loeb Smith’s Cayman Islands office with her role being to liaise with clients on a range of Compliance, Governance and Regulatory Affairs. Her commitment lies in fostering strong client partnerships while ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements. With her expertise in navigating complex compliance landscapes, Cindy provides proactive guidance to assist clients in adeptly mitigating risks and upholding compliance standards.

Latest Updates and News

INSIGHTS | 30 March 2026

How do creditors take security over limited partnership interests in a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership?

Exempted limited partnerships (“ELPs”) are a form of Cayman Islands partnership which are commonly used in investment fund structures, particularly closed-ended private investment funds. This can be contrasted with open-ended mutual funds which are typically structured using a Cayman Islands exempted company.
INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…
INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…
INSIGHTS | 17 March 2026

Cayman & BVI subscription credit facilities: key guide for PE

Subscription credit facilities – also known as “sub-lines” or “capital call facilities” – have gained prominence in recent years as flexible financing options for private equity sponsors and fund managers operating within the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands (BVI). This article highlights key features, legal considerations and…
INSIGHTS | 11 March 2026

BVI Company Restoration: Court process and requirements

We look briefly at how an application can be made to the court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) to restore a BVI company to the Register of Companies (Register), and aims to provide some practical insight into the restoration process.

Overview

Liz is a Partner in the Corporate and Funds Group and is also Head of Regulatory and Risk in which capacity she is key thought leader on regulatory licence applications, virtual assets, crypto and fintech regulation, corporate governance reviews,  anti-money laundering compliance frameworks, regulatory audits, Corporate Governance, CIMA inspections and remediations, sanction reporting and licencing, data protection laws, regulatory enforcement notices, administrative fines and on mandatory information exchange requirements. Prior to joining Loeb Smith she worked as a Corporate Attorney (M&A and Restructuring) in England specializing in cross-border and domestic M&A at DLA Piper and then advised on large scale corporate restructurings at KPMG Legal. She has a wealth of knowledge and experience in advising Cayman Islands and BVI Investment Funds of all asset types (private equity, hedge, venture capital, real estate, and crypto) on formation and launch, regulatory applications and compliance in the Cayman Islands and the BVI, restructuring, and wind downs. She also advises corporate transactions including joint ventures, privatisations, equity incentives and group re-organisations. Liz has authored many articles in relation to Cayman Islands legal and regulatory issues in publications such as Asia Business Law Journal.

Articles Written by Elizabeth

INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…
INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…
INSIGHTS | 11 March 2026

Cayman Islands – Cryptoassets and Blockchain (part 2)

Fiat currency transactions – What rules and restrictions govern the exchange of fiat currency and cryptoassets?
INSIGHTS | 23 February 2026

Fund Management in Cayman Islands (Part 2)

What are the main corporate structures used to set up a retail fund? How are they formed?
INSIGHTS | 17 February 2026

Cayman Islands – Cryptoassets and Blockchain (part 1)

What legal framework governs cryptoassets? Is there specific legislation governing cryptoassets and businesses transacting with cryptoassets?

Overview

Faye Huang is a legal consultant in our Corporate Group. Faye is also a Chinese qualified lawyer. She advises on the formation and launch of a wide range of hedge funds, PE funds, real estate funds and crypto assets funds in both Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands. Faye has also advised on corporate matters relating to M&A and joint venture transactions involving various Cayman company structures in Technology, Media, Telecom sectors. She has worked on a number of merger take-privates of Chinese owned and managed companies listed on the NYSE and on NASDAQ. Faye is fluent in Mandarin and Shanghainese and worked for a major U.S. law firm in Shanghai prior to joining our Corporate Group.

Latest Updates and News

INSIGHTS | 30 March 2026

How do creditors take security over limited partnership interests in a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership?

Exempted limited partnerships (“ELPs”) are a form of Cayman Islands partnership which are commonly used in investment fund structures, particularly closed-ended private investment funds. This can be contrasted with open-ended mutual funds which are typically structured using a Cayman Islands exempted company.
INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…
INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…
INSIGHTS | 17 March 2026

Cayman & BVI subscription credit facilities: key guide for PE

Subscription credit facilities – also known as “sub-lines” or “capital call facilities” – have gained prominence in recent years as flexible financing options for private equity sponsors and fund managers operating within the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands (BVI). This article highlights key features, legal considerations and…
INSIGHTS | 11 March 2026

BVI Company Restoration: Court process and requirements

We look briefly at how an application can be made to the court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) to restore a BVI company to the Register of Companies (Register), and aims to provide some practical insight into the restoration process.

Overview

Gary is a Partner in, and leads/coordinates, the firm’s Investment Funds Group. He worked as a Private Equity/M&A attorney in England for many years before moving to the Cayman Islands in 2009 to work as a Corporate/Investment Funds attorney.

Chambers & Partners Global has ranked Gary Smith in the top tiers of Investment Funds lawyers in the Cayman Islands and he is described by sources as: “a bright guy, a team player, and a hard worker” (Chambers 2014) and appreciated for maintaining “strong client-relationships and is highly regarded by sources in North America and Asia” (Chambers 2017). “his knowledge impresses me and his creativity is very good. He is also very patient and intelligent” (Chambers 2018)

Experience

Gary has the following experience and expertise:

  • Gary has given expert evidence in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York relating to Cayman investment funds. He has also authored a wide range of articles and other publications on Cayman Islands and BVI law matters, including: “Fund Management – Cayman Islands” published by Lexology, 2021/2022;  and “Cayman Islands – Cryptoassets and Blockchain” published by Lexology, 2024. In 2022, he was ranked in Asia Business Law Journal’s A-List of the top offshore lawyers. The list is based on extensive research conducted and nominations received from in-house counsel in Asia, and Asia-focused partners from domestic and international law firms. https://law.asia/the-a-list-top-offshore-lawyers-2022/. He is ranked in IFLR1000 as “Highly Regarded” for in the Practice Area of Investment Funds.
  • Gary’s practice focuses principally on (i) Cayman Islands and BVI Investment Funds formation and launch, particularly hedge funds, private credit funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, and funds investing in digital assets, (ii) M&A including Privatisations, (iii) Capital Markets including IPOs, SPACs, De-SPACs, and ongoing advisory, (iv) Corporate including joint ventures,  and PE/VC portfolio investments. He provides Cayman Islands law and BVI law advice to large corporates, companies, investment fund managers, allocators, sponsors, in-house counsel, onshore counsel, high net worth individuals, banks, and insurance companies in Asia (including the Middle East) and the Americas (U.S. Canada, Brazil, Argentina and elsewhere in Latin America) to deal with day-to-day legal issues and complex, strategic matters.

 

Articles Written by Gary

INSIGHTS | 26 March 2026

Private Funds in the Cayman Islands

This article will provide a general overview of the steps involved in the formation and running of a closed-ended investment fund in the Cayman Islands pursuant to the Private Funds Act (As Revised) (the “Act”). Whilst there are no statutory requirements as to the type of legal entity…
INSIGHTS | 23 March 2026

BVI: Conversion of Incubator Funds and Approved Funds and ongoing requirements

Among the many investment fund structures provided by the Financial Services Commission (“FSC”) of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) under the Securities and Investment Business Act (As Revised) of the BVI, Approved Funds and Incubator Funds have for a number of years been very attractive options for Start-up…
INSIGHTS | 11 March 2026

Cayman Islands – Cryptoassets and Blockchain (part 2)

Fiat currency transactions – What rules and restrictions govern the exchange of fiat currency and cryptoassets?
INSIGHTS | 23 February 2026

Fund Management in Cayman Islands (Part 2)

What are the main corporate structures used to set up a retail fund? How are they formed?
INSIGHTS | 17 February 2026

Cayman Islands – Cryptoassets and Blockchain (part 1)

What legal framework governs cryptoassets? Is there specific legislation governing cryptoassets and businesses transacting with cryptoassets?

Follow us on WeChat and receive latest news

wechat-logo WeChat QR