{"id":8029,"date":"2026-05-11T16:19:10","date_gmt":"2026-05-11T16:19:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.loebsmith.com\/?post_type=insight&p=8029"},"modified":"2026-05-11T16:19:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T16:19:12","slug":"cayman-islands-the-latest-position-regarding-tokenized-funds","status":"publish","type":"insight","link":"https:\/\/www.loebsmith.com\/cn\/insight\/cayman-islands-the-latest-position-regarding-tokenized-funds\/","title":{"rendered":"Cayman Islands \u2013 The latest position regarding tokenized funds"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The Cayman Islands\u2019 Mutual Funds (Amendment) Act, 2026 and the Cayman Islands\u2019 Private Funds (Amendment) Act, 2026 both came into force as of March 24, 2026. \u00a0The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Act, 2026 established a comprehensive regulatory framework for “tokenised mutual funds”, defining them as funds with equity interests represented by digital equity tokens. It mandates enhanced record-keeping, operator approval for transfers, and specific risk disclosures. The Private Funds (Amendment) Act, 2026 amends the Private Funds Act to define “digital investment tokens”, and mandates strict record-keeping, operator-approved transfers, and risk disclosures for funds where interests are represented by digital tokens.<\/p>\n

The key takeaway from the changes introduced is that tokenised funds are to be regulated within the existing\u00a0Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA)\u00a0funds regulatory framework, rather than as separate virtual asset entities.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n

\n \n

What are the key changes introduced by both Acts?<\/h2>\n
\n
    \n
  1. Additional definitions<\/u><\/strong> – The definition of \u201cdebt\u201d and \u201cequity interests\u201d have been expanded to include LLC interests. New definitions have been included respectively for \u201cdigital equity token<\/em>\u201d in respect of a tokenised mutual fund and \u201cdigital investment token<\/em>\u201d in respect of a tokenised private fund. In each respective case, meaning for \u201cdigital equity token<\/em>\u201d – a digital representation of the whole of an equity interest held by an investor, and meaning for \u201cdigital investment token<\/em>\u201d – a digital representation of the whole of an investment interest held by an investor. A new definition has also been included for “tokenised mutual fund<\/em>” and \u201ctokenised private fund<\/em>\u201d, being respectively a fund that has any of its equity interests\/ investment interests represented by digital equity tokens\/ digital investment tokens.<\/li>\n
  2. No custodian required<\/u><\/strong> \u2013 There is no requirement for a custodian to be appointed to hold the digital equity tokens or digital investment tokens in secure custody. However, disclosure as to who holds the underlying assets of the fund is material information for the fund\u2019s offering document (particularly where such assets are not held by an independent custodian which is subject to regulatory standards for maintaining custody).<\/li>\n
  3. No requirement for a CIMA licensed Administrator\/ principal office<\/u><\/strong> \u2013 There is no requirement for a tokenised fund to have a CIMA licensed administrator who also acts as the principal office. However, where a tokenised mutual fund does appoint a CIMA licensed administrator, they will need to comply with additional obligations. For example, a CIMA licensed administrator must be satisfied that all records relating to the ownership of tokens are securely maintained by the tokenised fund and readily available and that the tokenised fund has complied with the applicable statute.<\/li>\n
  4. Maintenance of records<\/u><\/strong> \u2013 If a Cayman Islands licensed mutual fund administrator is appointed, it must ensure secure maintenance of records related to token issuance, creation, sale, transfer, and ownership.<\/li>\n
  5. Transfer Restrictions<\/u><\/strong> – Tokens are only transferable with the approval of the operator of the tokenised fund and in accordance with the terms of the offering document.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n
    1. Risk Disclosures<\/u><\/strong> – Offering documents for tokenized funds must explicitly disclose risks related to digital tokens including cybersecurity risks, custody risks, and transferability risks, together with how such risks are addressed or mitigated for investors.<\/li>\n
    2. Annual confirmation<\/u><\/strong> – An annual confirmation will be required by CIMA from the operators of the tokenised fund that all records relating to the issuance, creation, sale, transfer and ownership of an equity interest\/. investment interest that is represented by a digital equity token\/ digital investment token have been properly kept and maintained in compliance with the requirements set out in the legislation.<\/li>\n
    3. CIMA supervisory powers<\/u><\/strong> – CIMA is granted supervisory powers over tokenised funds to ensure compliance with statute and the protection of investors interests, including inspections of the underlying technology and token transactions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      The\u00a0Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Act, 2026\u00a0which is also now in force clarifies that tokenised funds registered with CIMA are not subject to the VASP Act unless they engage in separate virtual asset services.<\/p>\n

      These changes clearly demonstrate that the Cayman Islands remains committed to fostering innovation, helping the jurisdiction stay at the leading edge, where traditional fund structures meet blockchain technology.<\/p>\n

      View Full PDF<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

      This publication is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice or a legal opinion. For specific legal advice on the subject matter of this Briefing, please contact your usual Loeb Smith attorney or Liz Kenny.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

      Partner: Elizabeth Kenny<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

      E: elizabeth.kenny@loebsmith.com<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

      Liz is a Partner in the Corporate and Funds Group and is also Head of Regulatory and Risk in which capacity she is key thought leader on regulatory licence applications, virtual assets, crypto and fintech regulation, corporate governance reviews, \u00a0anti-money laundering compliance frameworks, regulatory audits, Corporate Governance, CIMA inspections and remediations, sanction reporting and licencing, data protection laws, regulatory enforcement notices, administrative fines and on mandatory information exchange requirements.<\/em><\/p>\n

      \n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n